October 21st, 2016

Trust bosses call for re-inspection following poor CQC rating

Trust bosses call for re-inspection following poor CQC rating Trust bosses call for re-inspection following poor CQC rating
Updated: 10:21 am, Aug 19, 2016

DESPITE being ranked in the top 40 NHS trusts in the UK, South Warwickshire Foundation Trust has been told it must make improvements.

Earlier this year the trust – which covers Warwick, Leamington, Stratford and Shipston hospitals – was inspected by health regulators the Care Quality Commission (CQC).

Inspectors rated the trust as ‘good’ in the caring and responsive categories. But in safety, effectiveness and well-led categories the trust was marked as requiring improvement.

Some of the failures flagged up in the report included medicine kept in unlocked cupboards, incomplete risk assessments and night staff caring for double the recommended amount of patients.

But inspectors also praised some of the trust’s services, including the Central England Rehabilitation Unit (CERU) which supports people who have suffered brain injuries. They were also marked as outstanding for community nursing and the Warwick Hospital A&E department.

Overall 78 per cent of the CQC’s findings were ‘good’ or ‘outstanding’.

But the trust join 60 per cent of others across the country to be rated as requiring improvement.

Chief executive Glen Burley is now calling for a re-inspection after making the changes to the areas of concern.

He said: “We employ some of the best clinicians in the country and are extremely proud of the services that we deliver across Warwickshire and of our teams that provide them.

“The report confirms that we have been recognised nationally in many areas, in particular our work within accident and emergency and urgent care to improve patient flow where we are now providing support and advice to other organisations to help them improve safety. The CQC has also reported that our culture is positive and open with excellent staff survey results and patient feedback.

“There were only three recommendations that the CQC highlighted as important and these have all been addressed. We have requested a re-inspection at the earliest convenience with a different inspection team.”

And medical director Charles Ashton says the report does not reflect the trust’s performance.

He said: “With over 18 years’ experience as a medical director, I am confident of the high quality and safe care that we provide for our patients and service users. During my feedback session with the CQC, they provided assurance that there were no major concerns, this is reflected in the body of the report and I think it is unfortunate that our overall rating does not suggest this. I am proud of the teams and feel our clinical care is excellent.”

The trust say their rating went against many of the national indicators which place them in the top 40 in the country.

Bosses are hopeful the CQC will re-inspect and improve their score.